Call for Abstracts

2019 Call for Abstracts

 

We invite you to share your work via paper, panel workshop, symposium, or oral session (a 15-minute research summary) by submitting an abstract for the 51st Annual AAPB Scientific Meeting. The deadline for submissions is October 28, 2019 at 11:59 PM MT.
 
The goal of this conference is to convene healthcare professionals, clinicians, physicians, researchers, and professionals using biofeedback and applied psychology together to share information, research, concepts, and outcomes.
 
 
SUBMISSION GUIDELINES
• Abstracts must be categorized in one of the three tracks: 1. Basic Science (Intro or Advanced), 2. Hot Topics, and 3. Clinical Interventions and Optimal Performance
• Content should maintain, develop and increase conceptual and applied competencies that are relevant to biofeedback/neurofeedback practice, education, and science.
• Content should be based on current theory, method or practice and may provide information related to ethical, legal, statutory or regulatory policies, guidelines, and standards that impact biofeedback.
• Presentations should emphasize takeaways that attendees can use in their practice.
• For presentations discussing empirical research, presenters should report clear and appropriate statistical analyses and valid conclusions.
 

AAPB Commercial Bias Policy

Commercial Support is financial, or in-kind, contributions given by a commercial interest which is used to pay all or part of the costs of a Continuing Medical Education activity.

When there is commercial support there must be a written agreement that is signed by the commercial interest and the accredited provider prior to the activity taking place.

AAPB will not accept presentations that demonstrate ANY level of commercial bias or conflict of interest.  AAPB strongly adheres to the commercial bias criterion as described by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), as stated in Standard 5:

·Standard 5.1 The content or format of any AAPB approved presentation or its related materials must promote improvements or quality in healthcare and not a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.
·Standard 5.2 Presentations must give a balanced view of therapeutic options. Use of generic names will contribute to this impartiality. If the educational material or content includes trade names, where available trade names from several companies should be used, not just trade names from a single company.

Top 10 Actions Perceived by Health Care Professionals as Commercial Bias¹
1. Focusing on one agent, device, or procedure when others exist
2. Not providing a balanced presentation of the benefits and adverse effects for all agents, methods, or procedures in an activity
3. Most of the faculty have relationships with the grantor sponsoring the activity
4. References to inappropriate studies (promotional, bad design, etc.)
5. Inconsistent use of brand names
6. Misleading title
7. Lack of appropriate scientific references
8. Misleading learning objectives
9. Misleading overview statement
10. Endorsement of a particular product or practice by a respected and well-known expert in the field
Based on: Cornish and Leist. JCEHP 2006; 26:161-7.
For more information on what constitutes commercial bias compared with the personal opinion of experts, click here.

Further, please keep in mind that abstract reviewers will be looking to make sure all submissions comply with APA guidelines related to objectives and will ensure that all submissions are free of commercial bias.

 

POSTER SUBMISSIONS

Are you wishing to submit a poster abstract? Click here to complete a separate abstract submission specific to posters. The submission deadline for poster abstracts is November 18, 2019 at 11:59 PM MT. You will be notified of acceptance in December 2019.
 
Click here to review the poster guidelines.
Follow AAPBiofeedback on Twitter
Follow 121999491198448 on Facebook
image widget